← Search

Susan Voth

— year-end
126 matches · 80W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Susan Voth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-07-24 · X18 7.0 3 TP Rohrig · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Lambright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · A55 6.0W TP2 Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Theresa Leffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Norman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W TP1 Fox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Norman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-19 · X18 7.0 3 TP Rohrig · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Vasunia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · A55 6.0W TP2 Fox · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · A55 6.0W TP2 Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patti Tschantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-21 · A18 3.5W TP1 Fox · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johanna Nelsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-11 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · A18 3.5W TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Willett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Teams66 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 58.1% of games
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.3% of games
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 44.3% of games
6.0
80.6%
29W–7L · 59.5% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.8% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games
6.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 55.8% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert