← Search

Jen de Loizaga

Centennial, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 25W–32L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jen de Loizaga to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-08-17 · CHCC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Garnsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-03 · CHCC PURPLE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · CHCC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Garnsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · CHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirstin Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-15 · CHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Teeters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-10 · CHCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nanette Baumbusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Koelbel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · CHCC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Teeters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · CHCC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Balakas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-11 · CHCC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-02 · CHCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jordan Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2025-08-20 · CHCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Teeters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
53.2%
25W–22L · 48% of games
3.0
0%
0W–10L · 31.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#1 Singles
12%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova