← Search

Lacey Craig

— year-end
64 matches · 33W–31L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lacey Craig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
Margaret Roney / Blake Adams
2026-09-12 · Franks/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amber Sand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-22 · Franks/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amber Sand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Collette Reid-Rice / Kate Sullivan
2026-08-16 · Franks/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katy Kitchens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Franks/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amber Sand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Emily Papineau / Ashley Bush
2026-07-23 · Moody/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Cockrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Kelly Baker / Jesse Baker
2026-07-19 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luke Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
Stephanie Juneau / Phillip Kirlin
2026-07-12 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luke Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Wright/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luke Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · Moody/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madeleine Bobango
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-06 · Tidwell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melody Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · Craig/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keli Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-12 · Craig/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keli Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams33 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.1% of games
3.0
58.6%
17W–12L · 51% of games
3.5
0%
0W–10L · 27.5% of games
5.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 50% of games
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe