← Search

Melody Greene

— year-end
45 matches · 24W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Melody Greene to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Franks/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Danielle Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-24 · Franks/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marcela Salvador
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-06 · Tidwell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacey Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · Craig/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · Nair/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deepa Nair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-23 · Thompson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Charlotte Gillespie / Kate Sullivan
2026-04-19 · Craig/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Fruitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Blake Adams / Rebecca Brower
2026-04-16 · Nair/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Russum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · Thompson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Tidwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · Nair/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Letitia Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-26 · Thompson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shayni Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-11-20 · Thompson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Sadlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Teams24 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 55.3% of games
3.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 54.1% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 26.1% of games
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.3% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova