← Search

Abigail Douek

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 82W–39L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Abigail Douek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Durland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · Je.McIntyre18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · An.Enberg18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Crumpler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jolyne Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Je.McIntyre18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carrie Vander Vennet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · An.Enberg18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Enberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-30 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5
L
2026-05-29 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
Jacqueline Morgan
2026-05-26 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · Ke.Day18A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
71%
22W–9L · 58.4% of games
3.0
68.9%
31W–14L · 60.5% of games
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 46.5% of games
5.5
60%
6W–4L · 48.5% of games
6.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 58.7% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#1 Singles
21%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#2 Singles
13%
16 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe