← Search

Claire Capps

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 52W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Claire Capps to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Ha.Cain18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Blake Fricks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · Ha.Cain18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Duff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Ta.Anthony18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Badham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6
W
2026-07-14 · Ta.Anthony18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · Sa.Highsmith18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Sibley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · Ta.Anthony18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ferebee Plyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 60.2% of games
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 71.4% of games
3.5
73.3%
22W–8L · 59.5% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 47.9% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe