← Search

Maggie Dornseif

Greenwood Village, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 57W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Maggie Dornseif to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-09-03 · CHCC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · CHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · CHCC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-06 · CHCC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · CHCC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-07-09 · CHCC ORANGE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · CHCC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Tess Batchelder
2026-06-18 · CHCC RED · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
Veronique Benard
2026-06-11 · CHCC RED · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · CHCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · CHCC RED · #2 Female Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · CHCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 61% of games
3.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 59.1% of games
3.5
90.9%
30W–3L · 68% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 24% of the time
#1 Singles
24%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#1 Female Singles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
10%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe