← Search

Tiffany Sandusky

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 105W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tiffany Sandusky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-07-21 · EM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colley Moe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · CACM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kopp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-07 · EM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colley Moe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harold Kiefer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-02 · CACM TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Kitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · CACM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobbie Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · EM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Kappler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · EM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harold Kiefer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · CACM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Cuevas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · EM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Kappler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · CACM TEAL · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
86.2%
25W–4L · 61.5% of games
3.0
62.3%
38W–23L · 53.6% of games
3.5
45.2%
38W–46L · 47.9% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
33 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams