← Search

Tracy Stephanski

— year-end
45 matches · 21W–24L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tracy Stephanski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Malone 40+ 5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Liz Moysey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · Stephanski/Hollett-Mott · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-30 · Stephanski/Hollett-Mott · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Bassano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Stephanski/Hollett-Mott · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · Malone 40+ 5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Liz Moysey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · Kimbrough/Dupre 18+ Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Mussell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Dena Snyder / Jes Snyder
2026-08-01 · Curley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valtteri Halonen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
Meagan Koch / Adam Koch
2026-07-22 · Curley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenyon Mussell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
Amy Campbell / Joe Horbey
2026-06-29 · Curley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valtteri Halonen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · Curley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Carpenter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · Moysey/Stephanski · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Moysey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-29 · Moysey/Stephanski · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Moysey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
37.9%
11W–18L · 47% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.3% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 72.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova