← Search

Dena Snyder

Wilmington, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 14W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Dena Snyder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Connett/Edgerton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jes Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · Connett/Edgerton · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jes Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · Connett/Edgerton · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jes Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · Rhodenhiser/Shields CFCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-18 · Rhodenhiser/Shields CFCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Mcmanus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-15 · Rhodenhiser/Shields CFCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Mcmanus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · Rhodenhiser/Shields CFCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Mcmanus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · Rhodenhiser/Shields CFCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Bulluck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-18 · Rhodenhiser/Shields CFCC · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-11 · Rhodenhiser/Shields CFCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Janna Maynard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-02 · Rhodenhiser CFCC · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-18 · Rhodenhiser CFCC · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.7% of games
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 31.9% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 24% of the time
#3 Doubles
24%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#1 Singles
16%
4 matches
#2 Singles
12%
3 matches
#3 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams