← Search

Beth Goltz

Boulder, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 12W–10L · seasons 2022–2025

Captains: add Beth Goltz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2025-06-04 · BCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisabeth Warshafsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-21 · BCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Sonnenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-14 · BCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndy McClung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-08-28 · BCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Marissa Fahrbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-07-10 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emma Anselmi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-26 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emma Anselmi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-19 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cyndy McClung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-06-05 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cyndy McClung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-05-29 · BCC RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cyndy McClung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-05-22 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emma Anselmi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-15 · BCC RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cyndy McClung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-05-01 · BCC RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cyndy McClung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 51% of games
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#1 Singles
14%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams