← Search

Geneva Ritsch

Fort Collins, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 38W–22L · seasons 2022–2025

Captains: add Geneva Ritsch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2025-07-14 · MLF BRONZE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Stout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Lora Griffith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Jessica Bergen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-30 · MLF BRONZE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Bergen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-06-16 · MLF BRONZE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lora Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-10 · MLF ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-06-02 · MLF BRONZE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lora Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-05-30 · MLF ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-05-28 · MLF ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Pajak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-23 · MLF ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen McKnight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-23 · MLF ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Pajak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-19 · MLF ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Pajak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 66.7% of games
3.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 55% of games
6.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#1 Singles
15%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams