← Search

Mary Long

Morrisville, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 46W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mary Long to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Ma.Finney18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cara Mathers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-31 · Ma.Finney18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-24 · Ma.Finney18C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Na.Wireback18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Hollingsworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-12 · Ta.Yasin18M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Sherman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Na.Wireback18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Atherton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Madison Seidel / Heather Weddle
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Rebecca O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
Sandy Phillips / Abigail Altman
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Anna Jones / Kelly Townsend
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Melissa Smith / Lori Anne Emlong
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · with Rebecca O'Brien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Na.Wireback18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheldon Roberts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 53% of games
3.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 52% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.5% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.7% of games
3.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.5% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#2 Singles
9%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer