← Search

Lisa Baxter

Chapel Hill, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 98W–54L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lisa Baxter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-09-13 · LKulp-SVC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Sudzina Schut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-02 · RDavis-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joelle Permutt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-31 · Er.Wynia18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Dougherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-26 · RDavis-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Jarvis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · LKulp-SVC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin McElligott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · JMersereau-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-2
W
2026-08-09 · LKulp-SVC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Naftel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · Er.Wynia18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-22 · MBland-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Bland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · MBland-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Bland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-12 · JMersereau-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashlyn Zebrowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.6% of games
3.0
74.5%
41W–14L · 61.2% of games
3.5
52.4%
22W–20L · 49.5% of games
5.0
40%
2W–3L · 49.4% of games
6.5
71%
22W–9L · 58.4% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
34 matches
#1 Singles
14%
22 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#3 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer