← Search

Jessica Peterson

Lakewood, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 34W–51L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jessica Peterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-08-24 · RRTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rita Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-16 · RRTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Miao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · RRTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rita Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · RRTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rita Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb McEahern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · RRTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miranda Ku
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deena Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-06 · RRTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miranda Ku
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · NJ GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joni Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-15 · RRTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · NJ GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ingrid Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
54.3%
19W–16L · 48.9% of games
3.0
22.7%
10W–34L · 38.1% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 71.2% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#1 Singles
25%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova