← Search

Miranda Ku

Englewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 36W–41L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Miranda Ku to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-08-31 · RRTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rita Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-18 · CCV BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Detampel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-16 · RRTC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · RRTC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Elam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · RRTC PURPLE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Jessica Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · CCV BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Detampel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · RRTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · RRTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · RRTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · RRTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · CCV RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Detampel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–4L · 40.8% of games
2.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.9% of games
3.0
52.4%
22W–20L · 52.7% of games
6.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.7% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#1 Female Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe