← Search

Jeff Boehm

Colorado Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 38W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jeff Boehm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-07-15 · FHCS GUTIERREZ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juan Cuellar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · FHCS GUTIERREZ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Daniels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · FHCS BOEHM · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ashley Boehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-25 · FHCS BOEHM · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ashley Boehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · FHCS BOEHM · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ashley Boehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · FHCS GUTIERREZ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dimas Gutierrez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · FHCS GUTIERREZ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Guzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · FHCS GUTIERREZ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Francke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-24 · FHCS BOEHM · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ashley Boehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-23 · FHCS BOEHM · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ashley Boehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-19 · FHCS GUTIERREZ · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-13 · FHCS GUTIERREZ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Shawver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.4% of games
3.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 49.8% of games
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 46% of games
6.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 71.2% of games
6.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 63.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Singles
12%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer