← Search

Kris Nestoroski

Shelby Township, MI
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
92 matches · 56W–36L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kris Nestoroski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-07-21 · LT-Revello 18s 4.0M F4 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cesar Amendola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-16 · TROY-Ravikoti 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Michael Liss / Eric Moore
2026-07-14 · LT-Revello 18s 4.0M F4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cesar Amendola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Hermenegildo Malabed
2026-07-09 · TROY-Ravikoti 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-30 · LT-Revello 18s 4.0M F4 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · LT-Revello 18s 4.0M F4 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-10 · TROY-Ravikoti 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · LT-Revello 18s 4.0M F4 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-04 · TROY-Ravikoti 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alessandro Ugo Marazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-02 · LT-Revello 18s 4.0M F4 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · TROY-Ravikoti 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amogh Deo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · TROY-Ravikoti 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alessandro Ugo Marazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
76.3%
29W–9L · 60.3% of games
4.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 48.3% of games
7.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 60.4% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
33 matches
#2 Singles
32%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams