← Search

Jason Jirovec

Commerce Township, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 57W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Jirovec to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · BHC-Uhlar 40s 4.5M · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Kaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · BT-Snell 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · BT-Snell 40s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · BT-Snell 40s 4.0M F2 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dotun Ajao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · BT-Rosen 18s 4.0M F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn Snell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-04 · BT-Snell 40s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Kirsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-21 · BT-Snell 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jasper van der Bruggen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · BT-Snell 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jasper van der Bruggen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Michael Ayaub / Steven Brown
2026-05-12 · BT-Rosen 18s 4.0M F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn Snell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Denis DSouza / William Bell
2026-03-01 · BT-Rosen MEN MED TRI F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allan Zamierowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-21 · BT-Rosen MEN MED TRI F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Walker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-03 · #1 Doubles · with Will Butler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
72.7%
40W–15L · 60.5% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 57.5% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
38 matches
#1 Singles
21%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert