← Search

Chana Kolman

Colorado Springs, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 64W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Chana Kolman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-08-17 · LTFCS SHAINK · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Weston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Weston championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Weston championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · LTFCS SHAINK · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Weston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · CSRC REYNOLDS · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jim Zendejas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · GOG KREPS · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Jennifer Smith / Becky Cleveland
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Kim Weston championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · GOG KREPS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · GOG KREPS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · CSRC REYNOLDS · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jim Zendejas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · LTFCS SAUERLAND · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Weston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · GOG KREPS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Kreps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 65.9% of games
3.0
58.2%
32W–23L · 55.2% of games
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 46.7% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert