← Search

Tessa Vickers

Golden, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 74W–35L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Tessa Vickers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-08-24 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Weiland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tori Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Kolleen Konecny championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Kolleen Konecny championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
Tanya Hartney / Kristin Walters
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Emily Weiland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Emily Weiland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Emily Weiland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Emily Weiland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · RHCC RED · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-3
W
2026-07-13 · RHCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Frick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · RHCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Weiland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 60.6% of games
3.0
83.8%
31W–6L · 58.8% of games
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#1 Singles
20%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer