← Search

Alonza Jones

Clover, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
196 matches · 118W–78L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Alonza Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
W
2026-09-13 · MCTA18/Pavkov/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charles Greenlee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-03 · MCTA40/Kanase/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bhushan Patki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · MCTA18/Pavkov/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Micah Lucky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
John Hasty / Austin Reed
2026-08-16 · MCTA18/Pavkov/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bala Govardhan Palagiri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · MCTA18/Jager/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Goetz Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
RK Reddy / Dzianis Zhynko
2026-08-01 · MCTA18/Jager/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Volodymyr Stakh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · MCTA40/Kanase/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · MCTA18/Pavkov/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bala Govardhan Palagiri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · MCTA 3.5M 40 & Over (Moll) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Stanton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · MCTA 3.5M 40 & Over (Moll) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Hoover mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
Krishnaraj Sambandhan / Nikhil Bhat
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · with Rafael Balderrama championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Aaron Isenhart
2026-05-31 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 58.3% of games
3.5
68.6%
35W–16L · 56.2% of games
6.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 59.1% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 54.6% of games
3.5mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 65.1% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
44 matches
#1 Singles
21%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
39 matches
#2 Singles
8%
15 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova