← Search

Goetz Hagen

Rock Hill, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 38W–67L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Goetz Hagen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-09-12 · MCTA18/Jager/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Marlowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · MCTA18/Jager/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alonza Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-18 · MCTA18/Jager/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Marlowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · MCTA18/Jager/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Marlowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-11 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Paff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-04 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerome Lawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-28 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hartzog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-21 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hartzog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-07 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hartzog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-14 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerome Lawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Drossman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2025-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Burkhamer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
25%
3W–9L · 38.3% of games
4.0
21.4%
6W–22L · 44.6% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 50.3% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 38.3% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams