← Search

Chris Marks

Oklahoma City, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 43W–24L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Chris Marks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-08-17 · Da Gooses · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cody Yamamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · Da Gooses · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fred Lueck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · Da Gooses · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Golladay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-13 · Da Gooses · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fred Lueck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · Tornado Rally · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Skinner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · Tornado Rally · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · Tornado Rally · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antonio Bellido
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Christoph Schmidt-Warnecke / Hector Perez
2026-04-29 · Tornado Rally · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Don Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-15 · Tornado Rally · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Don Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-11-13 · Deucebags · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cody Yamamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-11-04 · Deucebags · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-16 · Deucebags · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 62.6% of games
3.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 56.7% of games
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 73.2% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 48.5% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#1 Singles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer