← Search

Nathan Harris

— year-end
48 matches · 25W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nathan Harris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-08-10 · Inglourious Backhands · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tony Mullican
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Inglourious Backhands · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gideon Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · Inglourious Backhands · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tony Mullican
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Inglourious Backhands · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tony Mullican
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-06 · Inglourious Backhands · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tony Mullican
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · Behemoth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stanley Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-03 · Behemoth · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-13 · Behemoth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stanley Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-22 · Behemoth · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
Andrew Smith
2026-04-15 · Behemoth · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Andrew Smith / Chris Marks
2025-11-04 · Team Beast Behemoth · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dar Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-10-28 · Team Beast Behemoth · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dar Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Teams11 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.4% of games
4.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.4% of games
6.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.3% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
22 matches
#2 Singles
21%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer