← Search

Jada Olson

Saint Paul, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 17W–16L · seasons 2022–2025

Captains: add Jada Olson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2025-07-28 · Overdahl/Dymit Sum25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-3
L
2025-06-17 · Overdahl/Dymit Sum25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2025-05-19 · Overdahl/Dymit Sum25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-12 · Overdahl/Dymit Sum25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2025-04-15 · Kim · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Min Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-24 · Overdahl/Dymit W25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-10 · Overdahl/Dymit W25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-27 · Overdahl/Dymit W25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-11-04 · Overdahl/Dymit ES 18+ · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-07 · Overdahl/Dymit ES 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-03-31 · NNM 3.5W HP - Erikson · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
Akm Kamal / Lauren Church
2023-06-22 · NNM 7.0 JC - Briggs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Friedman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.9% of games
3.5
25%
4W–12L · 39.9% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
12 matches
#2 Singles
27%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova