← Search

Danielle Wilder

Clayton, NC
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
345 matches · 230W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Danielle Wilder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history345 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Da.Wilder18S · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-31 · El.Copeland40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Uhland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-30 · Da.Wilder18C · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Emily Tinervin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
Allison Johnson / Laura Alvarez
2026-08-29 · ANP.Marks · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Shelly Kirkpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · TOC.Wilder · #3 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · Mi.Ahlquist40C · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Laura Alarcon Kerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · ANP.Marks · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Emily Tinervin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-01 · El.Speicher18T · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elizabeth Speicher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · TOC.Wilder · #3 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · El.Speicher18T · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elizabeth Speicher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · TOC.Wilder · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Jason Hull mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · El.Speicher18T · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Neal Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.5
74.1%
103W–36L · 60% of games
5.0
16.7%
4W–20L · 37.1% of games
8.5
76.6%
49W–15L · 59.5% of games
9.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 61.8% of games
9.5
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games
0.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.7% of games
9.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 60.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
123 matches
#1 Singles
23%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
59 matches
#2 Singles
4%
13 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert