← Search

Stephanie Carlsen

— year-end
43 matches · 25W–18L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Carlsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-07-04 · The Net Set · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Haywood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-21 · The Net Set · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · The Net Set · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · The Net Set · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-25 · #4 Doubles · with Rachael Barnard championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-4
W
2026-05-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-4
W
2026-05-24 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
W
2026-04-12 · MCC Mixed Madness · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Leander mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-29 · MCC Mixed Madness · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yeshua Goodman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · MCC Mixed Madness · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henry Kofron mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-01 · MCC Wahines · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mindy Armour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · MCC Wahines · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.8% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 49.5% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 23% of the time
#1 Singles
23%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
5 matches
#2 Singles
12%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova