← Search

Carol Lam

Wailuku, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 96W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carol Lam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Wells Gang · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wayne Feike mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Wells Gang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wayne Feike mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Pamela Henry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-04 · Wunder Women · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trudi Vierra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · Wunder Women · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · Wunder Women · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tesha Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-25 · #4 Doubles · with Ann Marugaki championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
9-8
L
2026-05-25 · #3 Doubles · with Pamela Henry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
W
2026-05-24 · #4 Doubles · with Ann Marugaki championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-6
L
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · with Pamela Henry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-8
W
2026-05-03 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Marugaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70.5%
31W–13L · 56.9% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 38.7% of games
7.0
85.2%
23W–4L · 61.5% of games
8.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
55.2%
16W–13L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
16 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams