← Search

Amelia Stephens

Nashville, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 26W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amelia Stephens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-07-27 · Protz/Givens Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Mouser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · Ladd/Stephens/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Dugan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · Ladd/Stephens/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with CJ Monte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Stephens/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katharine Buliga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-30 · Stephens/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kerry Elam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-06-09 · Thomas/Blevins/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-5
W
2025-06-01 · Ladd/Stephens/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Jorgensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-04-30 · Protz/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-04-21 · Stephens/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-04-19 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-17 · Protz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-04-16 · Stephens/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 64% of games
3.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 48.2% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 48% of games
3.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
9 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer