← Search

Amy Gilbride

Boulder, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 47W–12L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amy Gilbride to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-08-31 · BCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Mark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · BCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · BCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-06 · BCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-30 · BCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · BCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Devery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-02 · BCC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · BCC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · BCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-21 · BCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Whitling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 65.4% of games
3.0
88%
22W–3L · 63.6% of games
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 71% of the time
#1 Doubles
71%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams