← Search

Sarah Post

Broomfield, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 106W–94L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Sarah Post to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history200 matches
W
2026-08-27 · BRMST GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Bender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · BRMST GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · BRMST GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-04 · BRMST NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-28 · BRMST NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Hertzenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · BRMST NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · BRMST RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · BRMST NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Bender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · BRMST RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Cree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-07 · BRMST NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Hertzenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · BRMST RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
69.5%
41W–18L · 58.8% of games
3.5
52.2%
48W–44L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
29%
9W–22L · 44.1% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
33 matches
#1 Singles
10%
19 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova