← Search

Peggy Trammell

— year-end
74 matches · 48W–26L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Peggy Trammell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-09-04 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carla Maples
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carla Maples
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-21 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · RS-JOINER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Easom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · RS-JOINER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chrystal Wasden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · RS-JOINER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chrystal Wasden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · RN-Bloodworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tuti Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-25 · RS-WARD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sweenor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Anna Barnes / Jennifer Heller
2026-03-25 · RN-Bloodworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Roller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-25 · RN-MESSERVEY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Rubanov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-13 · RN-Bloodworth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Velasquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-13 · RN-Bloodworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carla Maples
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 70.5% of games
3.5
71.1%
27W–11L · 57.6% of games
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 42.4% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
11 matches
#1 Singles
10%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer