← Search

Sheryl Chandler

— year-end
85 matches · 39W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Sheryl Chandler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-08-17 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-10 · CACM BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-03 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie McClung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-06 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-14 · EM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Klein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-10 · EM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Schnetzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 24.6% of games
3.0
55.8%
29W–23L · 54.9% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59% of games
6.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.1% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#1 Singles
15%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer