← Search

Janice Kercheville

Aurora, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 63W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janice Kercheville to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-08-17 · CACM SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · CACM SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Ziccardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · CACM SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-29 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-22 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Ziccardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-15 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rene Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-08 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-01 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Ziccardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-22 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-21 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle McGinty - White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · CACM ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rene Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.3% of games
3.0
67.6%
25W–12L · 54.3% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 40.5% of games
6.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 59.6% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.4% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams