← Search

Elizabeth Noble

Nashville, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 19W–4L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Noble to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-08-13 · Hillwood CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Riebeling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · Hillwood CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Speller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · Hillwood CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Woodard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · Hillwood CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-22 · Stempel/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emerson Scales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-08 · Stempel/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Ludlam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-30 · Ludlam/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Alden Brett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-26 · Stempel/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emerson Scales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-25 · Stempel/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Ludlam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-23 · Ludlam/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Riebeling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-04 · Stempel/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Sundock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-17 · Ludlam/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Alden Brett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 65.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 61% of the time
#2 Doubles
61%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer