← Search

Ian Enterline

Kansas City, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 11W–8L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ian Enterline to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-06-23 · Holm, Mike · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Klaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · Holm, Mike · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-26 · Holm, Mike · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Lindmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-19 · Holm, Mike · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Waldron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · Holm, Mike · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Rodenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · Holm, Mike · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Rodenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-11-22 · Holm, Mike · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Waldron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-25 · Holm, Mike · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-04 · Holm, Mike · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Lindmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · Holm, Mike · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Bonner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2025-06-17 · O'Roark, Steven · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-27 · O'Roark, Steven · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
4 matches
#1 Singles
16%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer