← Search

Erinn Grady

Cleveland, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 33W–20L · seasons 2023–2025

Captains: add Erinn Grady to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2025-09-09 · Hamrick-Bear Pen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Hazlewood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-04 · Hamrick-Bear Pen · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Howarth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-07-01 · Hamrick - Bear Pen · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Brocato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-03-25 · Hamrick-Bear Pen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-12-02 · Swafford-CCC · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-11-21 · Swafford-CCC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-11-14 · Swafford-CCC · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-11-12 · Swafford-CCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-24 · Swafford-CCC · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-10-01 · Hamrick-Travel · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amee West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2024-09-23 · Hamrick-Travel · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Delanie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-09-17 · Hamrick - Travel · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Hazlewood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 57.3% of games
3.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 57.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 47.3% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 65.3% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.7% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches
#3 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe