← Search

Lauren Hiller

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 34W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lauren Hiller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-09-01 · La.Daigle40C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melanie Frost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-27 · Je.Jones18C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley Woolley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · Je.Jones18C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melanie Frost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · Je.Jones18C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kenzie Demetros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · Je.Jones18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · TOC.Armstrong · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jocelyn Quick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · TOC.Armstrong · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Raasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · TOC.Armstrong · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrienne Todd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-25 · Di.Kennedy18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Hochstrasser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Je.Jones18S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · TOC.Armstrong · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jocelyn Quick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · Di.Kennedy18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Sandy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 49.6% of games
3.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 48.9% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#3 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe