← Search

Jane Bossert

Cary, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 15W–37L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jane Bossert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-09-04 · Ja.Bossert18C · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lusally Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-31 · Ka.Serow55C5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Gwen Coyte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-28 · Ja.Bossert18C · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lusally Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · Al.Dugan40C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with AMY KOCH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-18 · Ja.Bossert18C · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Linda Martini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-15 · Ja.Bossert40C2.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Cotner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-14 · Ja.Bossert18C · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-10 · Ka.Serow55C5.5 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ann Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · NMAC.Robison · #3 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-01 · Ja.Bossert40C2.5 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Angela Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-31 · Ja.Bossert18C · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Christine Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-22 · NMAC.Robison · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
33.3%
12W–24L · 41.1% of games
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 28.4% of games
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#3 Singles
8%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal