← Search

Ann Mullins

Apex, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 17W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ann Mullins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-09-09 · ACP.Ogren · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kendall Ogren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-19 · ACP.Ogren · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · ANP.Mullins · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Dyvonne Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · ACP.Ogren · #3 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · ACP.Watson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-05 · ACP.Ogren · #3 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-03 · ACP.Watson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Chiaramonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · ACP.Watson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Chiaramonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · ANP.Mullins · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Arin Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · ACP.Watson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-14 · ACP.Watson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-10 · ACP.Watson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.9% of games
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 23.6% of games
5.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.9% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#1 Singles
16%
6 matches
#3 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova