Janet Gibb
Seattle, WA
34 matches · 6W–28L · seasons 2023–2025
Captains: add Janet Gibb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history34 matches
L
Elizabeth Heron / Kelda Schonhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Hyoung Yon Kim / Kathy Redman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Heather Robertson / Nicoleta Cristache
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 47.4% of games
3.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 33.6% of games
6.0
0%
0W–7L · 42.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#1 Singles
29%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
6 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.