← Search

Madison Humerick

— year-end
58 matches · 35W–23L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Madison Humerick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-06-11 · Marple · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-05 · Marple · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · Kemon - All About That Ace · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · RCC - Moyer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Walter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-10 · Kemon - All About That Ace · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Corley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · Kemon - All About That Ace · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-02 · Kemon - All About That Ace · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura McNicholl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-30 · Marple · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Carol Bernard / Mugdha Samant
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · with Joi Ruther championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
Kelly Blessing / Dianne Saal
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · with Joi Ruther championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · with Joi Ruther championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Jane Kim / Leigh McLister
2026-04-16 · Marple · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalia Simek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Teams24 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
70%
14W–6L · 54.1% of games
3.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 42.2% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
6.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 67.3% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
10%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova