← Search

Natalia Simek

— year-end
51 matches · 31W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Natalia Simek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-07-13 · Smith - RCC Summer 2026 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · Smith - RCC Summer 2026 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carthina Marple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · Smith - RCC Summer 2026 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leanne Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-11 · Marple · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tierney Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-01 · Smith - Serves You Right (RCC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leanne Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-29 · Smith - Serves You Right (RCC) · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · Marple · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Fedorchak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Marple · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Marlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-30 · Marple · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-20 · Team 2 FDP · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Liang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-1
L
Jane Kim / Leigh McLister
2026-04-16 · Marple · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Humerick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · Smith - Serves You Right (RCC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Marianne Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams23 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
73.3%
22W–8L · 57.3% of games
3.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 41.2% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.2% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#1 Singles
28%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams