← Search

Jeanne Sarmento

Henrico, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 47W–18L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jeanne Sarmento to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-09-03 · ACAC Kent · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-03 · ACAC Krebs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taryn Adkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-31 · ACAC Krebs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Saunders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-6
L
2026-08-23 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jenessa Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-17 · ACAC Krebs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melody Morton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Ashley Houghtaling championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Ashley Houghtaling championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-06 · Avalon Armstrong · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Holzem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Avalon Armstrong · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Holzem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Avalon Ghita Mix 55 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roberto Sarmento mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-25 · Avalon Ghita · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Holsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · ACAC Kent · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 65% of games
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 50.9% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.3% of games
5.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 71.1% of games
6.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe