← Search

Emilie Raymond

Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 31W–18L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Emilie Raymond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Westwood - Payne/Hassett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Sharrar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-24 · Westwood - Payne/Hassett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly McEvoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · Westwood - Payne/Hassett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirstine Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
Julianne Nitta / Jennifer Ko
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Heather Harker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-11 · Westwood Berry · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Harker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · 13 Westwood Gee · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with MaryAnn Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · Westwood Berry · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly McEvoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-27 · Westwood Berry · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · Westwood Berry · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly McEvoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · 13 Westwood Gee · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Britta Janney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Michelle Yu / Jeanna Kim
2026-06-13 · Westwood Berry · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly McEvoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · 13 Westwood Gee · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bianca Nunes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 51.9% of games
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.7% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert