← Search

Rachel Burford

— year-end
104 matches · 53W–51L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rachel Burford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Tomlinson-NC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terrie Dietsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-08 · Tomlinson-NC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melanie Sparks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Charping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Tomlinson-NC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melanie Sparks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · Steinhausler/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Samantha Rohlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Roedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-06 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Roedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-03 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-05 · Galdieri/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Swanquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · Hirt/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Rohlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Teams43 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 47.8% of games
3.0
50%
16W–16L · 50.3% of games
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 43.5% of games
5.5
70.4%
19W–8L · 56.2% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova