← Search

Terrie Dietsch

— year-end
68 matches · 18W–50L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Terrie Dietsch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Tomlinson-NC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Burford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-02 · Picha/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellen Skinner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · Tomlinson-NC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · Picha/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellen Skinner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1
L
2026-07-29 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Palacio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Jennifer Lee / Lindsey Myers
2026-06-23 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paige Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Salina Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · Sutton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · Lacy/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Salina Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ping Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams22 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.1% of games
3.5
20.4%
10W–39L · 38.9% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer