← Search

Vicki Carde

— year-end
63 matches · 33W–30L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Vicki Carde to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Miles/Mathis-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Roman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · Miles/Mathis-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Roman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
Hae Jin Kim / Lauren Smith
2026-08-23 · Miles/Mathis-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darlene Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Williams-Allen-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pearlie Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · Williams-Allen-CC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Naomi Rigby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-21 · Williams-Allen-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claudia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-13 · Carde/Mckee-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Spenard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · CORTA/Pat Kelley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darlene Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · Carde/Mckee-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Rumley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-19 · Carde/Mckee-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · CORTA/Pat Kelley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darlene Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · Carde/Mckee-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darlene Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams33 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 76% of games
3.0
54.5%
24W–20L · 50.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 31.1% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams