← Search

Carmen Eaton

Bridgeton, MO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 33W–40L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Carmen Eaton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-05-03 · Calcagno (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabrina Siyanbola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · Krekler/Merbaum (SD) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · Calcagno (S) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-07 · Krekler/Merbaum (SD) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-29 · Calcagno (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabrina Siyanbola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-22 · Calcagno (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabrina Siyanbola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-16 · Krekler/Merbaum (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Divin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-15 · Calcagno (S) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-09 · Krekler/Merbaum (SD) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · Calcagno (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manju Ramchandani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-23 · Krekler/Merbaum (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-15 · Calcagno (S) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.3% of games
3.0
46.7%
28W–32L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#2 Singles
14%
10 matches
#1 Singles
12%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova